Two takes on the same theme
If
you do something that others consider hard but for you it is coming naturally
does that count as a challenge?
On
the other hand tackling something that is a huge obstacle for you but not for
others is that a challenge too?
Sorting
through the many different definitions to achieve any sort of understanding is hard and essentially they all use the same
terminology; engage, fight, compete, confront, test, demand, victory.
Flooded
with all these power charged words one has to assume that a challenge has to do
with big powerful occurrences. That it is always teamed with drama and at least
a mild level of aggression. That only few can face up to and emerge victorious.
But
what about those who go through life just performing their regular tasks? Yes,
here the terminology strikes again, regular folks, daily tasks, so plain and
unassuming almost boring.
Somehow
it seems that going through life’s regular tasks and performing them to the
best of our abilities is as challenging as any duel, only longer. Being born is
a challenge, going through the different stages of maturity is risky and full
of obstacles, finding the right mate, creating a family, giving birth and
tending to our children needs. Protecting them and directing them through the
endless issues our changing world is making them face. And through all of it
holding a steady job, maintaining a stable and safe household, remaining
supportive, encouraging and above all calm.
It
seems like a challenge all right, actually it seems like such a colossal challenge
it is almost impossible to fathom how one person can tackle it alone.
***
Some
people look at life as a huge mountain situated in front of them ominous yet
alluring. They know they’ll have to climb to make it to the top, to be winners,
to stick their flag at the top and declare success. But on the way up they
might at times make a very slow progress, lose their breath or periodically
even slide back. Sadly enough when they finally make it to the top and are able
to take a deep breath and take in the view they often wonder what was the
purpose of all the huge effort? Now it is going down all the way and they could
have reached that same point by following those other folks who decided not to
climb at all and go around the mountain. Could they decide to stay up there, on
the top of the mountain? Or like the old cliché it is lonely at the top and it
looks so much greener and inviting down there in the valley.
Tell you what, Ariela--after two semesters and many dozens of comments from me, you probably have a good idea of what sort of thing I'm likely to say in response to these. So if you like, I'm asking you today to imitate my voice and post your johngoldfine comment.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the honor :-)
ReplyDeleteI think we had this conversation before when you expressed your surprise at the fact that I was not always sure if a written piece was good, very good, just OK, terrible.
I think the problem is twofold;
a. Do I think it is good, am I satisfied with what I wrote?
b. Do you think it is good?
On the philosophical level, art is often a matter of taste and while you seem to prefer the smaller topics, the more concrete ones, I have a soft spot for bigger than life topics, a certain measure of vagueness (maybe ambiguity) just thoughts and occasionally science fiction.
So while we might never agree on some stuff at times you surprise me when you like something that I thought will present an issue.
The bottom line is that I am still confused.
At times I just know that something is good because I can sense the easy almost natural flow, and other times I just ‘bet’ …
This one was one of those, yes…no…maybe…
"On the philosophical level, art is often a matter of taste and while you seem to prefer the smaller topics, the more concrete ones, I have a soft spot for bigger than life topics, a certain measure of vagueness (maybe ambiguity) just thoughts and occasionally science fiction."
ReplyDeleteThere--that's what I would have said!